Sunday, October 31, 2010

Thesis Statement and Program Analysis

Thesis Statement:




Theater’s success lies in its ability to supernaturally immerse the audience within a performance. The performance evicts a human interest from the audience members, this then bridging the experience from reality to a willing suspension of disbelief. Some architects attempt to create a willing suspension of disbelief through the creation of computer-generated forms that exceed straightforward manifestations as buildings. However, these forms camouflage their failure to create a human interest. This thesis explores how architecture can create a willing suspension of disbelief that sparks a human interest and in turn triggers an imaginative experience.




Program Statement:





The program itself must not create a willing suspension of disbelief. This thesis looks at the combination of two programs. The architecture must bridge the gap between the two, this then creating a human interest. The program must first be different but similar enough to have a connection. Through the architecture, the program will interlock in order for both to visually and physically interact on a daily basis. The circulation cores will be separated and wrap around the activities of the related programs. With the architecture creating these important connection between program types, a human interest is achieved and an imaginative experience takes place.


Process:









Program Analysis Reinvestigated:



Point of View




Circulation Vs. Activity
Program Analysis:


Point of View




Activity Vs. Circulation



Adjacency








No comments:

Post a Comment